From: Evan Lenz (elenz@xyzfind.com)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 08:40:41 CET
Chris Bayes wrote:
> I agree on keeping things simple but things can be grouped and it is
> easier to parse a tree in xslt than strings so what about
> <input-uris xmlns="http://www.xmlportfolio.com/transquery">
> <group path="">
> <document href="foo.xml"/>
> <document href="bar.xml"/>
> </group>
> <group path="http://www.example.com/">
> <document href="http://www.example.com/bat.xml"/>
> </group>
> </input-uris>
> But then maybe not.
I guess I don't see the advantage that this would provide, especially since
such grouping would make no difference in the resulting node-set to be
constructed. A simple set of URIs, however that's specified in XML, still
seems like the best approach to me.
Evan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 22 2002 - 11:35:58 CET