[transquery-discuss] Input Parameter

From: Leigh Dodds (ldodds@ingenta.com)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 12:06:43 CET

• Next message: Dan Diebolt: "[transquery-discuss] Aggregate Functions and Closure"
• Previous message: Leigh Dodds: "RE: [transquery-discuss] Transquery use of Saxon, extensions"
• Next in thread: Evan Lenz: "RE: [transquery-discuss] Input Parameter"
• Reply: Evan Lenz: "RE: [transquery-discuss] Input Parameter"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

As a means to further discussion about the goals/aims of Transquery
is it worth discussing the need for a standardised input for a
collection of documents?

In other words:

Why use a separate top-level parameter, rather than providing
the document collection as input directly?

Cheers,

L.

-- 
Leigh Dodds, Research Group, Ingenta | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham

• Next message: Dan Diebolt: "[transquery-discuss] Aggregate Functions and Closure"
• Previous message: Leigh Dodds: "RE: [transquery-discuss] Transquery use of Saxon, extensions"
• Next in thread: Evan Lenz: "RE: [transquery-discuss] Input Parameter"
• Reply: Evan Lenz: "RE: [transquery-discuss] Input Parameter"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Feb 22 2002 - 11:35:58 CET